Magazine Revision
Front Cover Analysis
The magazine front cover is supposed to sell the magazine
Masthead is very conventional - large serif bold font and the top of the page
Price is 7d which is around 80p now
Main image is a close up of a smiling women
It has a very specific brand identity
It reinforces patriarchal views
Its selling a lifestyle to the target audience
Aspirational
'are you an A-level beauty'
'they're like snow caped volcanos' - Alfred Hitchcock
Strapline at the bottom, the cover lines shows us whats in the magazine
background colour is stereotypically feminine
friendly and welcoming mode of address, she is hegemonically attractive
Explore the extent to which regulatory factors have influenced the magazine that you have studied. Make reference to Women and Adbusters
Regulation are the rules and restrictions every media product has to follow
Magazine in the UK is largely unregulated
Regulation has had very little effect on either magazine that we have studied. However there are some elements of Adbusters which push into legal grey areas.
Women magazine is not controversial for the target audience in the 1960's howvever no it could be considered quite controversial.
Plan:
Industry theorist:
Curren and seaton - profit and power
Cultivation Theroy
Regulation theory - livingstone and lunt - they say regulation is impossible due to digitally convergent technoloys
self regulation - women magazine doesn't have any reference to sex or drugs because they are choose what they can and can't show themselves.
Reinforces patriarcal ideologies potentially effecting the body image of the female target audience.
Society creates its own regulation
Adbusters controversial subjects - they critize brands directly - mocking
Places adverts in a new context - culture jamming
Adbusters is a big independent magazine, but is small enough to go under the rader. Being independent allows adbusters to get away with things larger magazine could not get away with
Adbusters is subversive, its not for profit
Comments
Post a Comment